Cape Cod Acoustics
  • Home
  • Your Lessons
  • Performance services offered
  • About Gene
  • Contact
  • Guitars, Ukes & Accessories
  • Acoustic Guitar Blog
  • Tips for guitarists
  • Guitar Gallery
  • More...

She was ugly from the front

1/2/2011

0 Comments

 
One of many great lines from one of my favorite songwriters, Lyle Lovett. Cruel? Yes but can any of us deny that looks play into how we feel about just about everything? Guitars - for sure.

Do looks have anything at all with how a guitar plays or sounds? Almost never. In the most radical situations, i.e., a guitar that obviously has a severely warped neck or a bridge that is in the process of coming unglued is an ugly thing to see and is a dead giveaway of a completely undesirable instrument. More often though what is ugly in a guitar is a totally subjective thing.

Back in the 1980s when I had quite a few young rockers for students the group Kiss was all the rage. The guitar player (forgive me if I've forgotten his name!) used a Gibson Flying V and a couple of my students saved their money religiously until they could buy one. Now, I understand that the "that looks sooo cool!" outlook of a teenage rocker plays into it but to me, those things were just about the ugliest things in the electric guitar market. Not only that, they were all but impossible to play when sitting down because in spite of a rubber pad on one side a Flying V just wants to slide off your lap when you play. Kiss of course NEVER played while sitting down but the teenage rockers never seemed to think through it quite that far. Ugly may be too harsh a term to describe a Flying V. Silly - that is probably a better description. Didn't stop thousands of Kiss fans from buying them though.

I readily admit to having silly issues with the looks of certain brands of acoustics that are on the market right now. The first that comes to mind are Tacomas. Here was a company that tried to do something that made a lot of sense: produce a mostly hand-made acoustics, in the U.S., using premium materials and offering their guitars for a reasonable cost. Unfortunately, many of their guitars had issues with the finish coming off in sheets and binding coming unglued. One thing that didn't come unglued was their bridges. Those things were about an inch thick and quite wide, but when Tacoma decided to make them in a shape that would immediately identify their guitars, they blew it, bit time, in my book. Every time I see the bridge on a Tacoma it reminds me of The Lolllipop Kids in the Wizard of Oz. You know, the Munchkins with the crooked mouths who sing, "We represent the Lollipop Guild, the Lollipop Guild, the Lollipop Guild..."  It's just me I know, but every time I see a Tacoma with its crooked, arched bridge, I start humming that tune!

Another company from that part of the country, Breedlove, makes very modern looking acoustics with a bridge that looks something like a lightning bolt. Ugly, ugly, ugly in my book. I'll bet I'm not the only one who feels that way either, as Breedlove also makes their Traditional Series, which are dead ringers for vintage Martins. Hedging their bets?

Some bridge shapes are very attractive though and not only serve to spread the vibration of the strings but also enhance the overall look of the guitar. Taylor's bridge does that for me. The "spread wings" on Goddall guitars is classy and understated and quite elegant I think. Martin's "belly bridge" is functional, simple looking and probably the most widely copied bridge shape in the guitar world. I've always been a bit put off by the "reverse belly" bridge on some Gibson acoustics. Did they do that originally to just be different than Martin or did some person in the factory mess up, and they decided to stick with it? If anyone reading this knows the answer I would love to know.

I had a discussion the other day with a guy who was buying a guitar from me, about cosmetic issues and how they affect our buying decisions. He is an experienced, long-time player and he said he just couldn't bring himself to buy any guitar with a satin finish because he felt it makes a guitar look "cheap."  Part of me agrees with that way of thinking, but I know that the reality is that makers of premium guitars look for ways to compete with less expensive imports and one way is to offer an otherwise high quality guitar with satin finish sides and backs. Martin does this with any guitar that has somewhere in its name "GT" - which indicates a gloss top. Or put another way - gloss on top but satin everywhere else. 

The irony with the issue of satin finish on guitars is that it's highly likely that a guitar with satin sides and back will sound better than the same one with gloss all the way around. That is because a glossy guitar just can't vibrate as well as one with less finish. But oh my, is there anything prettier than the back of a rosewood guitar with glossy finish when it's just been polished?!

Then there is the question of bling. Now we enter the realm of absolutely-no-effect-on-sound but what is good looking and what is over the top. As anyone who reads this blog with regularity knows, I am a huge fan of Martin guitars but I have to say - Martin's top of the line 45-series instruments are just too garish for me. Every edge and angle has mother-of-pearl inlay and for me, it's just too much. I do happen to like the 45-style Martin logo on the head and LOVE the old style "torch" inlay that they still use on some custom instruments. Taylor is much more judicious with their use of abalone inlay and they sometimes add nice touches of it in small designs on the neck. Some of the import companies go way overboard on its use too, ruining (in my opinion) the look of otherwise nice instruments.

But these are ultimately just questions of what we like. I happen to like understated elegance in guitar design but I know many folks like flash. Whatever. What you have to decide is: how much does the way a guitar looks contribute to wanting to own it for some period of time.

Or as my dad used to say, "There's no accounting for taste!"

Peace & good music,
Gene



0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Gene Bourque

    Archives

    November 2024
    September 2024
    July 2024
    June 2022
    May 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed