Cape Cod Acoustics
  • Home
  • Your Lessons
  • Performance services offered
  • About Gene
  • Contact
  • Guitars, Ukes & Accessories
  • Acoustic Guitar Blog
  • Tips for guitarists
  • Guitar Gallery
  • More...

A Primer on Wood: Part 1, guitar bodies

12/6/2010

0 Comments

 
I'm often asked by students and others who hear me play and are guitarists about the different woods that are used to construct guitars. This is a huge subject and players with experience often have very definite opinions about the relative merits of different types of wood. The two qualities that are most often discussed are tonal qualities and durability. I'm going to plunge in and offer my thoughts based on owning more than fifty acoustics over the years and playing probably twice that many. As with most things that are purely subjective you may very well hear entirely different opinions and that's fine. Ultimately the choice is yours.

The three most common types of wood used for the backs and sides of acoustic guitars are rosewood, mahogany and maple. Each has strengths and weaknesses, both in tone quality and structural integrity. I'll start with rosewood.



Picture
This is the back of my primary guitar, a Martin 0000-28H. It is made of East Indian rosewood, which is the choice of virtually all guitar makers these days who make guitars from rosewood. Time was that rosewood from Brazil was used but this became scarce and very expensive around the late 1960s when the government of that country decided to forbid the export of log-length, uncut rosewood. Guitar companies were unwilling to use rosewood that they couldn't cut themselves to ensure quality control so they turned to rosewood from East India. Today you can still buy Brazillian rosewood new guitars but they are incredibly expensive. Why? Because of its scarcity and beauty of course but also because many guitarists feel it has the best sound in terms of complexity and resonance.

That is fairly subjective but one thing is for sure. ALL Brazillian rosewood guitars by Martin, Gibson and others built before 1970 have shot up in price radically in the last few years. Some sound great, some are good but not spectacular. There are other factors involved beyond the materials, things like bracing, top wood grain, finish and a few other things.

Generally, compared to mahogany and maple, rosewood guitars sound much complex with subtle overtones and often a pleasing, soft "waa-waa-waa" sound that sustains for quite a long time. Rosewood is also quite beautiful with various shades of chocolate brown. If there is some "swirl" in modern East Indian rosewood as was common in the Brazilian stuff, so much the better at least in terms of value.

That's "the good." The bad is that rosewood is much more prone to cracking if not properly humidified and the tonality and overall sound can change quite radically on a seasonal basis if you live somewhere with warm, humid summers and cold, dry winters. Also, rosewood rapidly loses its beautiful tonal complexity as the strings go dead. I've heard guitars that cost many, many thousands of dollars that sounded awful with strings that were old but gloriously came to life when new strings were put on. As an example, when I was recording with fiddler Marie Rhines back in the 1970s, during one two-week series of recording sessions I changed the strings on my D-28 four times! And I don't even have particularly sweaty hands - I just wanted my Martin to sound its best for the recording.

Picture
Here's am image of one of my recent guitars, a new Martin D-15, which is made out of mahogany. Or is it? Mahogany, like some kinds of rosewood is becoming scarce and many guitar makers are choosing to go with a wood called sapele, which is virtually identical to mahogany. Martin has been pretty cagey about whether some of their guitars are made of sapele or mahogany although very recently they began producing a line with the suffix "M" to indicate that they were in fact mahogany.

I can't tell any difference in the ways that matter, although in some cases mahogany with a gloss finish tends to have more of a quilted look that is quite attractive, while sapele is pretty even and uniform.

Mahogany is less expensive than rosewood and while some might argue this statement, mahogany does not have the complexity of sound that you find with rosewood. It is preferred by many guitarists however because the tone is even, easily controlled and mahogany guitars record very well because those overtones aren't something a recording engineer has to contend with via equalization. Mahogany has a nice punchy sound and usually has better treble than rosewood, although that is not always the case. It is also more durable, less prone to cracking and less affected by changes in humidity. Strings last longer too - unless you happen to have very sweaty hands, a set of strings will sound good three to four times as long on a mahogany guitar compared to rosewood.

Unfortunately, even true vintage mahogany guitars do not have the value of similar rosewood models, even by the same manufacturer. This doesn't mean they are bad instruments - far from it - they just are not generally as desirable in the vintage, used guitar market.

Picture
Lastly we have maple. This is the back of one of the guitars I presently have for sale, a Guild CV-2. Maple is absolutely striking in appearance and as with this guitar, is often has an almost 3-D sheen. I think the reason maple is much less popular than the other two body materials has to do with tone. Sadly, many maple guitars are pretty dull specimens, sound wise, with very little resonance, complexity, sustain or volume (that is NOT the case with this one by the way - it is possibly the best sounding and playing maple guitar I've ever had the pleasure to play - GREAT treble, deep bass, sustain and just as loud as any guitar of its size). So why do companies make maple bodied guitars? The looks, for sure, but they are extremely durable, unaffected by all but the most radical changes in humidity and they sound wonderful when strummed.
Picture
Picture
Then there some more exotic variations of guitar bodies, such as these two combining two types of wood. The one in the case is a Martin OMC-OGTE and the one standing up is a Takamine OO size. The Martin has mahogany with a center wedge of rosewood and the Tak has rosewood with a center section of quilted maple. Both are very striking and beautiful. I don't think the combinations have much effect on sound (the Martin sounds like what it mostly is: mahogany, and the Takamine sounds like its primarily rosewood body. But they sure are pretty and for me at least a pleasing look counts for a lot.

Next time we'll take a look at necks, fronts, fingerboards and bridges.

Peace & good music,
Gene
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Gene Bourque

    Archives

    June 2022
    May 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed